Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apinac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn and no-one else supports deletion. Bencherlite ^Talk 10:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apinac

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Anup Mehra ^✈ 08:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

??? Why do you want the article to be deleted, Anupmehra? --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, it is a sourced article about a village/commune in France. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:49, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep (no reason given like nominator). ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article has improved since last visit. Earlier it was an one line article with a single mis-leading reference. As, It has been now expanded and the unreliable reference has been replaced with multiple reliable sources, AfD tag must be removed. Anup Mehra ^✈ 09:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make any difference. Such an article will always be notable, lack of content or sources or not. Most municipality-level divisions are currently short stubs on wikipedia, most of France in fact. Expansion is the way forward, trust me, they're all notable. If you want something expanded, please ask, otherwise you'll find a swift close like this..♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.